HAWKING- THE MASTER OF BLACK HOLES

by Anaswara.J.S.(2016-2019)

anaswarajs@gmail.com

StephenHawkingPassing.jpg

“Most physicists work with equations using pen and paper, but because of his disability, Hawking found it easier to visualize things in his mind.” – Alan Lightman

Despite his profound disability, Stephen Hawking inspired millions around the world. But Hawking, who died on 14-March-2018, Wednesday at the age of 76, made his greatest contributions as a theoretical physicist. His books, papers, and lectures turned generations into armchair cosmologists and transformed our understanding of the universe — especially with regard to  black holes .

The first black hole was discovered in 1971, and we now believe that 100 million or so are sprinkled across the universe. Most astronomers now believe that black holes lie at the center of most, if not all, galaxies, including our own Milky Way.
But at the time of Hawking’s birth in 1942, black holes were little more than a mathematical quirk — a prediction of Albert Einstein’s 1916 theory of general relativity . The term black hole itself wasn’t coined until the 1960s, when scientists began to realize that Einstein’s math actually described real objects — gaping abysses of raw gravitational force so powerful that they suck in dust, gas, and stars and stop light itself from escaping.

In the 1960s, Hawking and fellow British physicist Roger Penrose built on Einstein’s theories to describe the physical characteristics of black holes and showed that when a star collapses it forms an infinitely dense point called a singularity — the birth of a black hole.
Hawking also helped confirm the Big Bang theory. Drawing once again from Einstein’s equations, he and Penrose showed that 13.8 billion years ago the universe emerged violently from a single compressed point no bigger than an atom.

hawking zero gravity .jpg

Classically, a black hole should be ‘perfectly cold’ in the sense that it absorbs everything but emits nothing. This is how they were understood in the early 1970s. A black hole like that would radiate no energy, and no matter could escape from it. It would just… exist, cold, silent, and eternal.

When Hawking considered quantum mechanical effects in the mid-70s, he discovered that black holes should, in principle, radiate as if they were thermal objects with a temperature.
“If they radiate energy then their mass will decrease. And he found that as this happens, as they shrink, their temperature goes up and they radiate even faster.” Eventually, perhaps, the black hole would disappear entirely, or shrink to a little nubbin. Without fully reconciling relativity and quantum mechanics in a robust theory of “quantum gravity” (what physicists call a “theory of everything”), the final stage of that black hole evaporation remains a mystery.

The problem is that, according to his calculations, the radiation is perfectly thermal. It doesn’t retain any information about the state of the material that formed the black hole, and this would violate a fundamental rules in quantum mechanics.

INSPIRING BLACK HOLES

Whatever the truth, Hawking remained convinced that by attempting to understand the universe’s inner workings, humans can learn valuable lessons about themselves. As he explained in a 2015 lecture, black holes offer can their own form of inspiration.
“Black holes are not the eternal prisons they were once thought,” he said. “Things can get out of a black hole both on the outside and possibly come out in another universe. If you feel you are trapped in a black hole, don’t give up. There is a way out.”

hawking-radiation-10-638

BLACK HOLE PARADOX

Quantum physics requires that the whole future and past of every particle should be, in principle, possible to figure out and link through a series of chained, causal, probabilistic events. But if a black hole release an undifferentiated soup of particles with their information — their histories — unrecoverably erased, then that requirement is fundamentally broken.

HawkingRadiation

The most dramatic late-career paper Hawking wrote suggested the black holes as they’ve classically been understood don’t exist at all.
In ” Information Preservation and Weather Forecasting for Black Holes ,” published in 2014, he suggested that the “event horizon” around black holes, the point beyond which even light could not escape, doesn’t really exist. Instead, he wrote, there’s simply an “apparent” horizon of trapped light which could fade away and allow the light to escape.

YET TO BE ANSWERED

ozegna.jpg

“The absence of event horizons mean that there are no black holes — in the sense of regimes from which light can’t escape to infinity,” he wrote.
He also suggested some fundamental conceptual problems with a number of features physicists had attributed to black holes, like “firewalls” around their boundaries that destroy observers who try to enter.

In 2016, Hawking introduced  ” Soft Hair on Black Holes .”
i.e;
The black holes are surrounded by “soft” or zero-energy particles , which he call hair. That hair, he  wrote, stores the lost information of particles emitted by black holes on “holographic plates” beyond the black holes’ boundary regions. So the information, while displaced, is never truly lost.

In  1960, black holes were described  not only by means of the general theory of relativity, but also methods of quantum mechanics. As a result it has become clear that to quantize the classical theory of gravitation in the same way as, for example, classical electrodynamics or mechanics, it won’t turn out. Hawking has gone some other way and has applied thermodynamics to black holes. He systematically applying thermodynamics to black holes, has removed an exact formula of entropy. Black holes radiate — owing to vacuum fluctuations. On the horizon of events couples of virtual particles are formed: one of them, with positive energy, departs from a black hole, another, with negative — falls in it, thereby reducing its weight. Hawking quantitatively calculated a thermal range of a black hole. For example, temperature of a black hole of solar weight — about one million kelvin. It is impossible to distinguish so small temperature from noise by modern astronomical methods.

104826221-GettyImages-520642806.530x298.jpg

                                                             R.I.P. Stephen Hawking

Super Blue Blood Moon 2018

by Abhijith.A.D(2016-2019)

https://www.facebook.com/abhijith.vjmd

FB_IMG_15173268577943446-01

For the first time in 152 years, three lunar events coincided with each other on the night of January 31: a supermoon, a blue Moon and blood moon, making it one of the most rare and beautiful lunar displays in recent years.

A supermoon occurs when the Moon is unusually close to the Earth which makes it appear larger and brighter in the sky. Out of the 12 or 13 full Moons that occur each year, only three or four achieve supermoon status. 2018 has already been host to two supermoons.

Although this display was rare, the UK missed out on the spectacle. Only those in the US, Asia, Australia and Russia got to see the full eclipse. And only parts of China were lucky enough to see the show.

694940094001_5703108724001_5703081230001-vs.jpg

If you missed this Super Blue Blood Moon, make a note in your diary for 2037. This is the next time the three events are likely to coincide. 19 years isn’t so long…

 

DARK MATTER & DARK ENERGY

by Adwaith.B.S(2016-2019)

adwaithbalachandran123@gmail.com

IMG_20180123_131358

The other “dark” substance in our universe. Dark matter,.We can’t see it and we can’t feel it, but we can test for it, and nobody knows what it is.This elusive substance has some differences to dark energy though; the only way that we have observed it is indirectly. We know that there must be more matter in the universe than we can see because we can measure its gravitational effects, but no one knows exactly what makes up this mysterious stuff.

IMG_20180123_083025

. In spite of this, scientists think that dark energy makes up around 70% of the universe. It was imagined to explain why galaxies don’t just drift apart but instead accelerate away from each other. You can think of it as a repulsive gravity that pushes matter apart. How it works, however, is still a mystery.

maxresdefault (1)

  Dr.Thanu Padmanabhan  )

Over the last decade,Dr.Thanu Padmanabhan  had defined dark energy as a mathematical term known as the ‘cosmological constant’ by slightly altering Einstein’s theory of relativity. Einstein himself had abandoned the theory after suggesting it, reports The Telegraph.

Padmanabhan also calculated a value for the cosmological constant, 1 divided by 1 followed by 123 zeroes. He, reportedly, proved this to be the number of atoms of space that can be counted in the universe.

Though Wiltshire accepted the cosmological term to have part relevance, he was sceptical about the present findings on dark energy which might be considered an accident in observation. He believed that inaccuracies might come up from a misinterpretation of non-local gravitational energy as per the report by The Times of India.

 

Neutron-star merger yields new puzzle for Astrophysicists

by Sidhi.S.L.Nair(2016-2019)
Sidnair017@gmail.com

maxresdefault.jpg

*Afterglow from cosmic smash-up continues to brighten, confounding expectations*

January 18, 2018
McGill University
The afterglow from the distant neutron-star merger detected last August has continued to brighten – much to the surprise of astrophysicists studying the aftermath of the massive collision that took place about 138 million light years away and sent gravitational waves rippling through the universe. New observations indicate that the gamma ray burst unleashed by the collision is more complex than scientists initially imagined.

FULL STORY


[[This graphic shows the X-ray counterpart to the gravitational wave source GW170817, produced by the merger of two neutron stars. The left image is the sum of observations with NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory taken in late August and early Sept. 2017, and the right image is the sum of Chandra observations taken in early Dec. 2017. The X-ray counterpart to GW170817 is shown to the upper left of its host galaxy, NGC 4993, located about 130 million light years from Earth. The counterpart has become about four times brighter over three months. GW170817 was first observed on Aug. 17, 2017.
Credit: NASA/CXC/McGill/J.Ruan et al.]]

The afterglow from the distant neutron-star merger detected last August has continued to brighten — much to the surprise of astrophysicists studying the aftermath of the massive collision that took place about 138 million light years away and sent gravitational waves rippling through the universe.

New observations from NASA’s orbiting Chandra X-ray Observatory, reported in Astrophysical Journal Letters, indicate that the gamma ray burst unleashed by the collision is more complex than scientists initially imagined.

“Usually when we see a short gamma-ray burst, the jet emission generated gets bright for a short time as it smashes into the surrounding medium — then fades as the system stops injecting energy into the outflow,” says McGill University astrophysicist Daryl Haggard, whose research group led the new study. “This one is different; it’s definitely not a simple, plain-Jane narrow jet.”

ChandraNew.jpg

{ Chandra X-ray Observatory}

Cocoon theory

The new data could be explained using more complicated models for the remnants of the neutron star merger. One possibility: the merger launched a jet that shock-heated the surrounding gaseous debris, creating a hot ‘cocoon’ around the jet that has glowed in X-rays and radio light for many months.

The X-ray observations jibe with radio-wave data reported last month by another team of scientists, which found that those emissions from the collision also continued to brighten over time.

While radio telescopes were able to monitor the afterglow throughout the fall, X-ray and optical observatories were unable to watch it for around three months, because that point in the sky was too close to the Sun during that period.

“When the source emerged from that blind spot in the sky in early December, our Chandra team jumped at the chance to see what was going on,” says John Ruan, a postdoctoral researcher at the McGill Space Institute and lead author of the new paper. “Sure enough, the afterglow turned out to be brighter in the X-ray wavelengths, just as it was in the radio.”

Physics puzzle

puzzleans.jpg

That unexpected pattern has set off a scramble among astronomers to understand what physics is driving the emission. “This neutron-star merger is unlike anything we’ve seen before,” says Melania Nynka, another McGill postdoctoral researcher. “For astrophysicists, it’s a gift that seems to keep on giving.” Nynka also co-authored the new paper, along with astronomers from Northwestern University and the University of Leicester.

The neutron-star merger was first detected on Aug. 17 by the U.S.-based Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO). The European Virgo detector and some 70 ground- and space-based observatories helped confirm the discovery.

The discovery opened a new era in astronomy. It marked the first time that scientists have been able to observe a cosmic event with both light waves — the basis of traditional astronomy — and gravitational waves, the ripples in space-time predicted a century ago by Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity. Mergers of neutron stars, among the densest objects in the universe, are thought to be responsible for producing heavy elements such as gold, platinum, and silver.

 

Black hole research could aid understanding of how small galaxies evolve

by Sidhi.S.L.Nair(2016-2019)
Sidnair017@gmail.com
1-13743-c0141244-black_hole_artwork-spl-1.jpg
January 9, 2018
University of Portsmouth
Summary:
Scientists have solved a cosmic mystery by finding evidence that supermassive black holes prevent stars forming in some smaller galaxies.

FULL STORY

180109141912_1_540x360
Size comparison of a dwarf galaxy (right inset, bottom) with a larger galaxy in the centre. Top inset: Dwarf galaxy overlain with some of the MaNGA data, revealing the winds from the supermassive black hole.
Credit: Samantha Penny (Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation, University of Portsmouth) and the SDSS collaboration
Scientists have solved a cosmic mystery by finding evidence that supermassive black holes prevent stars forming in some smaller galaxies.
These giant black holes are over a million times more massive than the sun and sit in the centre of galaxies sending out powerful winds that quench the star-making process. Astronomers previously thought they had no influence on the formation of stars in dwarf galaxies but a new study from the University of Portsmouth has proved their role in the process.
The results, presented today at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society, are particularly important because dwarf galaxies (those composed of up to 100 million to several billion stars) are far more numerous than bigger systems and what happens in these is likely to give a more typical picture of the evolution of galaxies.
Dwarf Galaxy Chart small
Dwarf galaxies  outnumber larger galaxies like the Milky Way 50 to one,” says lead researcher Dr Samantha Penny, of the University’s Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation. “So if we want to tell the full story of galaxies, we need to understand how dwarf systems work.”
In any galaxy stars are born when clouds of gas collapse under the force of their own gravity. But stars don’t keep being born forever — at some point star formation in a galaxy shuts off. The reason for this differs in different galaxies but sometimes a supermassive black hole is the culprit.
Supermassive black holes can regulate their host galaxy’s ability to form new stars through a heating process. The black hole drives energy through powerful winds. When this wind hits the giant molecular clouds in which stars would form, it heats the gas, preventing its collapse into new stars.
Previous research has shown that this process can prevent star formation in larger galaxies containing hundreds of billions of stars — but it was believed a different process could be responsible for dwarf galaxies ceasing to produce stars. Scientists previously thought that the larger galaxies could have been interacting gravitationally with the dwarf systems and pulling the star-making gas away.
Data, however, showed the researchers that the dwarf galaxies under observation were still accumulating gas which should re-start star formation in a red, dead galaxy but wasn’t. This led the team to the supermassive black hole discovery.
150310-dwarf-galaxy-3
Dr Penny said: “Our results are important for astronomy because they potentially impact how we understand galaxy evolution. Supermassive black holes weren’t thought to influence dwarf systems but we’ve shown that isn’t the case. This may well have a big influence on future research as simulations of galaxy formation don’t usually include the heating effect of supermassive black holes in low-mass galaxies, including the dwarf systems we have examined in this work.”
The team of international scientists used data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), which has a telescope based in New Mexico, to make their observations. Using SDSS’s Mapping Nearby Galaxies at Apache Point Observatory (MaNGA) survey, they were able to map the processes acting on the dwarf galaxies through the star systems’ heated gas, which could be detected. The heated gas revealed the presence of a central supermassive black hole, or active galactic nucleus (AGN), and through MaNGA the team were able to observe the effect that the AG

Black hole spin cranks-up radio volume

by Sidhi.S.L.Nair(2016-2019)
Sidnair017@gmail.com
black-hole-tidal-disruption-event
January 12, 2018
National Institutes of Natural Sciences
Summary:
Statistical analysis of supermassive black holes suggests that the spin of the black hole may play a role in the generation of powerful high-speed jets blasting radio waves. By analyzing nearly 8000 quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, research team found that the oxygen emissions are 1.5 times stronger in radio loud quasars than in radio quiet quasars. This implies that spin is an important factor in the generation of jets.
Share:

     

FULL STORY

IMG-20180117-WA0027.jpg

[The rotation of the black hole may cause the high-speed jet which makes the object radio-loud.
Credit: NAOJ
Statistical analysis of supermassive black holes suggests that the spin of the black hole may play a role in the generation of powerful high-speed jets blasting radio waves and other radiation across the Universe.
Black holes absorb light and all other forms of radiation, making them impossible to detect directly. But the effects of black holes, in particular accretion disks where matter is shredded and superheated as it spirals down into the black hole, can release enormous amounts of energy. The accretion disks around supermassive black holes (black holes with masses millions of times that of the Sun) are some of the brightest objects in the Universe. These objects are called “quasi-stellar radio sources” or “quasars,” but actually this is a misnomer; only about 10% of quasars emit strong radio waves. We now know that “radio loud” quasars occur when a fraction of the matter in the accretion disk avoids the final fate of falling into the black hole and comes blasting back out into space in high-speed jets emitted from the poles of the black hole. But we still don’t understand why jets form some times and not other times.
220px-BH_LMC.png
A team led by Dr. Andreas Schulze at the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan investigated the possibility that the spin of the supermassive black hole might play a role in determining if the high-speed jets form. Because black holes cannot be observed directly, Schulze’s team instead measured emissions from oxygen ions [O III] around the black hole and accretion disk to determine the radiative efficiency; i.e. how much energy matter releases as it falls into the black hole. From the radiative efficiency they were able to calculate the spin of the black hole at the center.
By analyzing nearly 8000 quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, Schulze’s team found that on average the O III oxygen emissions are 1.5 times stronger in radio loud quasars than in radio quiet quasars. This implies that spin is an important factor in the generation of jets.
Schulze cautions, “Our approach, like others, relies on a number of key assumptions. Our results certainly don’t mean that spin must be the only factor for differentiation between radio-loud and radio-quiet quasars. The results do suggest, however, that we shouldn’t count spin out of the game. It might be determining the loudness of these distant accreting monsters.”
howmassiveis.jpg

Story Source:

Materials provided by National Institutes of Natural Sciences. [Note: Content may be edited for style and length].

Journal Reference:

Andreas Schulze, Chris Done, Youjun Lu, Fupeng Zhang, Yoshiyuki Inoue. Evidence for Higher Black Hole Spin in Radio-loud Quasars. The Astrophysical Journal, 2017; 849 (1): 4 DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9181
Cite This Page:
MLA
APA
Chicago
National Institutes of Natural Sciences. “Black hole spin cranks-up radio volume.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 12 January 2018. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/01/180112095929.htm>.

Cosmology

by Abhijith.A.D(2016-2019)

https://www.facebook.com/abhijith.vjmd

maxresdefault (1).jpg

Cosmology  is the study of the origin, evolution, and eventual fate of the universe. Physical cosmology is the scientific study of the universe’s origin, its large-scale structures and dynamics, and its ultimate fate, as well as the scientific laws that govern these areas.

The term cosmology was first used in English in 1656 in Thomas Blount‘s Glossographia, and in 1731 taken up in Latin by German philosopher Christian Wolff, inCosmologia Generalis.

Religious or mythological cosmology is a body of beliefs based on mythological, religious, and esoteric literature and traditions of creation myths and eschatology.

Physical cosmology is studied by scientists, such as astronomers and physicists, as well as philosophers, such as metaphysicians, philosophers of physics, andphilosophers of space and time. Because of this shared scope with philosophy, theories in physical cosmology may include both scientific and non-scientific propositions, and may depend upon assumptions that cannot be tested. Cosmology differs from astronomy in that the former is concerned with the Universe as a whole while the latter deals with individual celestial objects. Modern physical cosmology is dominated by the Big Bang theory, which attempts to bring together  observational astronomy and particle physics: more specifically, a standard parameterization of the Big Bang with dark matter and dark energy, known as theLambda-CDM model.

Theoretical astrophysicist David N. Spergel has described cosmology as a “historical science” because “when we look out in space, we look back in time” due to the finite nature of the speed of light.